User:MatJC
From Borsukipedia
Mat Carmody's Page
Contents |
AS Philosophy
Homework
Explain and illustrate the difference between analytic and synthetic. (15 marks)
This is an important pair of terms. Look in the Reason and Experience reader in the chapters on Hume and Kant for how to define them. Roughly: an analytic sentence is one true in virtue of meaning alone, such as a bachelor is an unmarried man. A synthetic sentence is one true in virtue of the meaning and something else. So, Waterloo bridge crosses the Thames is synthetic because, given what the words mean, it is made true or false by the external world. Try to come up with your own examples.
To what extent does knowledge of reality depend on our conceptual scheme? (30 marks)
Reading: chs. 11-13 of your Reason and Experience reader. Also look at the powerpoints on the Reason and Experience page.
This is an essay that is designed to get you to think about Kant and those who followed him: the linguistic relativists. Kant argued that we could not know reality as it but only as our mind made it appear. Kant’s predecessors thought that reality is ‘out there’ to be known. Whether we can know it or not depends on how powerful you think the mind is. Rationalists thought the mind was equipped with innate ideas and a faculty of reason able to grasp truths about reality: in particular, what exists. Locke argued that all knowledge of existence is a posteriori. Knowledge of what exists is possible but limited. We may never know the 'hidden natures' of things. Berkeley and Hume in different ways argued that we cannot know anything beyond our ideas: either because the very idea is senseless (Berkeley) or because we cannot reason our way to the causes of the ideas in our minds (Hume).
Kant argues that experience is only possible if our minds organise the raw data into something structured and coherent. The structure is the scheme of concepts or conceptual scheme. The result is thoughts and experiences with content. Kant’s successors argued he was on the right track but did not go far enough. There was not one scheme but many. Your language and culture determines your scheme.
You need to assess whether this thought is a good one. Does what we know depend upon the language we speak? Do speakers of different realities know different worlds? Think of what we said about how we can translate between languages. Think about the problem of translating the word right into Chinese that was discussed in the video.
Think too about whether Kant was right to say our minds shaped the world as one in space and time. Think about whether Kant ends up saying no more than Hume and Berkeley: that, if the mind shapes the world, what we see is not the world but a creation of our mind.
A2 Philosophy
Homework
- A2 Modules 1, 5 and 6: Two mini-essay questions for the week after half-term (starting Monday, 20th February 2012).
1: Explain one motivation for Descartes’ substance dualism and two criticisms.
- Descartes' two motivations are (i) the Conceivability/Real Distinction argument; (ii) the Divisibility argument.
- We have looked at the following challenges: (i) Arnauld's challenge; (ii) Elizabeth's challenge; (iii) Kant's challenge.
2. Explain one motivation for (Logical) behaviourism and two criticisms.
- You will find all of the motivations and challenges in chapter 3 of the Philosophy of Mind reader.
Important advice: these are not to be approached in the style of the full essay you will need to write in the summer. These mini-essay questions are designed to get you to master the skills of presenting arguments for and against clearly. Doing this will be an essential part of the overall project of assessment that you will be doing in the main essay.
IB TOK
Essay and presentation supervisions
You will be uploading your essay on the weekend of Saturday 10th/Sunday 11th March. They will be sent off to the IBO first thing on Monday 12th March. This is a proper deadline so don't turn up at the office midday on the Monday with memory stick hoping that we can somehow override the IBO's security systems.
For more details, go to the How To Upload Your Essays page.
Friday, 10th February 2012
Sarah: 1.50 p.m.
Hannah: 2.05 p.m.
Katie: 2.20 p.m.
Tatiana: 2.35 p.m.
Monday, 20th February 2012
Jonathan: 9.00 a.m.
Mariana: 9.15 a.m.
Naima: 9.30 a.m.
Michael: 9.45 a.m.
Friday, 24th February 2012
Senni: 1.50 p.m.
Lilly: 2.05 p.m.
Kate: 2.20 p.m.
Kaoru: 2.35 p.m.
Monday, 27th February 2012
Dory: 9.00 a.m.
Toby: 9.15 a.m.
Natty: 9.30 a.m.
Ana: 9.45 a.m.
Friday, 2nd March 2012
Cate: 1.50 p.m.
Ejona: 2.05 p.m.
Sonia: 2.20 p.m.
FREE: 2.35 p.m.
Monday, 5th March 2012
FREE: 9.00 a.m.
FREE: 9.15 a.m.
Anca: 9.30 a.m.
FREE: 9.45 a.m.
Friday, 9th March 2012
FREE: 1.50 p.m.
FREE: 2.05 p.m.
FREE: 2.20 p.m.
FREE: 2.35 p.m.
Presentation Groups
- Katie and Cate
- Jelena and Sonia
- Kaoru and Dory
- Sarah
- Senni
- Tatiana
- Anthony and Leo
- Anca and Cathie
- Toby
- Jonathan and Mariana
- Michael
- Max
- Miguel and Roland
- Naima, Ana and Natty
Currently uncertain: Linnea, Holly, Demi, Hannah
Tutees
We meet on Tuesdays at 12.35 a.m. in room 2E10.
EPQ
X
Working title:
Our next meeting is on (TBC) at (TBC).
X
Working title:
Our next meeting is on (TBC) at (TBC).
X
Working title:
Our next meeting is on (TBC) at (TBC).
X
Working title:
Our next meeting is on (TBC) at (TBC).
X
Working title:
Our next meeting is on (TBC) at (TBC).
X
Working title:
Our next meeting is on (TBC) at (TBC).
Contact
Room 2E7 - 020 8607 8339 - email me
